Skip to main content

Avoiding Alert Fatigue

Alert fatigue occurs when staff receive so many alerts that they stop reviewing them carefully. Aim for alerts that are:
  • Relevant - Aligned with your safeguarding priorities
  • Actionable - Staff can respond appropriately
  • Focused - High signal-to-noise ratio
A system with 50 alerts per week where 40 are not actionable is worse than a system with 10 alerts per week where all 10 require follow-up.

Getting Started

Start with Essential Rules

When first setting up alerts, focus on your highest-priority safeguarding concerns: Recommended starter rules:
  1. Child Protection Disclosures
    • Category: Child Protection
    • Recipients: DSL, Deputy DSL
  2. Self-Harm Incidents
    • Category: Self-Harm
    • Recipients: DSL, Mental Health Lead
  3. Looked After Children
    • Student Group: LAC Students
    • Recipients: Designated Teacher, DSL
Start with 3-5 rules and add more as you understand how alerts work in your school context.

Rule Design Tips

Combine Criteria for Precision

Instead of creating separate rules for each scenario, combine criteria to create targeted alerts: Less effective:
  • Rule 1: Any bullying incident (too broad)
  • Rule 2: Any Year 7 incident (too broad)
More effective:
  • Combined rule: Bullying incidents involving Year 7 students (specific and actionable)

Use Student Groups Strategically

Student groups are powerful for targeting alerts to vulnerable populations: Useful student groups for alerts:
  • Looked After Children (LAC)
  • Students on Child Protection plans
  • Students with EHCP
  • Pupil Premium students
Keep student group membership up to date. Alerts rely on accurate group data.

Name Rules Clearly

Good rule names help staff immediately understand the concern:
Less ClearMore Clear
”Rule 1""Self-Harm - All Students"
"Bullying alert""Bullying Incidents - Year 7"
"LAC""Any Incident - LAC Students”

Common Rule Patterns

Category-Focused Rules

Alert on specific incident types that always require senior staff awareness:
  • Child protection disclosures
  • Self-harm or suicidal ideation
  • Sexual abuse concerns
  • Serious physical harm

Student-Group-Focused Rules

Alert when any incident involves students from vulnerable groups:
  • Looked After Children
  • Children on CP/CIN plans
  • Students with mental health support plans

Location-Focused Rules

Monitor specific areas where incidents may require attention:
  • Unsupervised areas
  • Areas with previous incident clusters
  • Off-site locations

Managing Alert Volume

If Receiving Too Many Alerts

  1. Review rule criteria: Are rules too broad?
  2. Combine criteria: Add filters to narrow scope
  3. Prioritize: Focus on critical categories
  4. Remove duplicates: Check for overlapping rules

If Receiving Too Few Alerts

  1. Check rule criteria: Are they too restrictive?
  2. Verify data: Are categories being selected on incidents?
  3. Check recipients: Are the right people included?
  4. Review enabled status: Are rules active?

Periodic Review

Monthly Check

  • Are alerts being actioned appropriately?
  • Are any rules triggering without useful outcomes?
  • Do recipients still need to receive these alerts?

Termly Review

  • Do rules reflect current safeguarding priorities?
  • Have student groups changed?
  • Are there new categories that need alert rules?

Annual Review

  • Full audit of all alert rules
  • Remove outdated rules
  • Align with updated safeguarding policy

Troubleshooting

  • Review which rules trigger most frequently
  • Add criteria to make rules more specific
  • Route alerts to appropriate staff via user groups
  • Remove rules without actionable outcomes
  • Check category is selected correctly on incidents
  • Verify rule criteria matches incident characteristics
  • Ensure recipients are configured
  • Check rule is enabled
  • Review rules for overlapping criteria
  • Consider consolidating similar rules
  • May be intentional if different staff need notification